How We Rank AI Girlfriend Apps
The Value Index™ scores platforms by what you actually get before paying extra, divided by what it costs. No subjective reviews — just pricing data and a formula.
The Value Index™ — One Score, Zero Opinions
Most AI girlfriend comparison sites test a platform for an afternoon and publish a subjective rating. The Value Index takes a different approach: it's a single score (0–100) calculated from two data points that anyone can verify.
How many features — chat, images, voice, video, memory — are included on the cheapest paid plan without extra credits or add-ons.
50% weightValue per dollar. A $5/month plan with 3 features beats a $20/month plan with 4 features. The cheapest viable plan in our index scores 100.
50% weightA platform can't score high by being cheap but feature-poor. It also can't score high by offering everything at a price nobody should pay. You need both to rank well — that's the entire point of the geometric mean.
Why a Geometric Mean Instead of a Simple Average?
A simple average lets platforms game the system. Score 90 on features and 10 on price, and the arithmetic mean still shows a respectable 50. The geometric mean gives that same platform a score of 30 — which is closer to how a real user would experience it.
The UN does the same thing. The Human Development Index combines life expectancy, education, and income using a geometric mean. A country can't compensate for low life expectancy with high GDP. We apply identical logic: a platform can't compensate for bad pricing with good features.
This isn't a novel approach. The OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators (2008) recommends geometric means for exactly this type of multi-dimensional comparison, and peer-reviewed research has confirmed that the geometric mean penalizes imbalance in a way that produces more meaningful rankings.
How We Collect Pricing and Feature Data
Pull pricing from official sources
Every data point comes directly from the platform's public pricing page. Monthly rates, annual rates, token costs, credit pack prices — documented and verifiable. We never use third-party estimates.
Map feature access by tier
Each feature is categorized as unlimited, capped (with a specific monthly limit), or credit-based (costs extra per use). We document the cheapest paid plan that gives real access to each feature — not the free trial, not the enterprise tier.
Calculate the effective monthly price
Annual plans are divided by 12. Credit packs are converted to per-use costs and estimated for moderate monthly usage. The goal is one comparable number: what does a real user actually pay per month?
Run the formula and publish
Feature Score and Price Score are normalized to 0–100, then combined via geometric mean. Every ranking page shows the last-updated date. Data is re-pulled from pricing pages monthly.
What We Measure for Each AI Girlfriend Platform
Five feature categories and full pricing data. No subjective quality ratings — only whether a feature exists, what its limits are, and what it costs.
| Feature | What We Record |
|---|---|
| Chat | Message limits from pricing page. Access tier: unlimited, capped, or credit-based. |
| Image Generation | Images included per month on cheapest paid plan, or credit cost per image. |
| Voice | Minutes included per month, or credit cost per minute of voice interaction. |
| Video | Clips included, length limits, credit costs. Noted if feature exists at all. |
| Memory | Context window persistence tier: basic, standard, or enhanced long-term memory. |
| Pricing | Monthly rate, annual rate (÷ 12), credit pack prices, token expiration policy. |
Open-Source Formula
The ranking formula is published. You can read it, verify it, or tell us it's wrong.
// Why geometric mean? // A simple average lets platforms game the system — // score 90 on features and 10 on price, average = 50. // Geometric mean gives that same platform a 30. function valueIndex(featureScore: number, priceScore: number): number {return Math.sqrt(featureScore * priceScore);}// Feature score: 0-100 // Counts included features on cheapest paid plan // chat + images + voice + video + memory // Each weighted by access tier: // unlimited = 20pts, capped = 12pts, credits = 5pts // Price score: 0-100 // Normalized against cheapest plan in index // priceScore = (cheapest / thisPrice) * 100 // Sources: // [1] UNDP Human Development Index — geometric mean // [2] OECD Handbook on Composite Indicators (2008) // [3] Aggregating the HDI (Springer, 2024)
Affiliate Disclosure
Links on this site are affiliate links.
Commission rates have zero weight in the Value Index formula — rankings are calculated purely from feature access and pricing data. Platforms with no affiliate program have ranked above high-commission platforms when the math favored them. We believe transparency about how we earn revenue makes our methodology more trustworthy, not less.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the Value Index™ rank AI girlfriend apps?
It calculates a 0–100 score from two inputs: feature coverage (what's included without extra cost) and price efficiency (value per dollar). These are combined using a geometric mean — the same mathematical method the UN uses for the Human Development Index.
Why not just rank by price?
Because a $3/month plan with only text chat is a fundamentally different product than a $10/month plan with chat, images, voice, and video. Price alone doesn't tell you what you're getting. The Value Index accounts for both dimensions.
Do affiliate commissions affect the rankings?
No. The formula takes two inputs: feature access data and pricing data. There is no input for commission rate. Platforms without affiliate programs have outranked platforms that pay commissions when their feature-to-price ratio was better.
How often is the data updated?
Monthly. AI companion platforms change pricing frequently — new tiers, adjusted credit costs, seasonal promotions. Every ranking page shows the exact date data was last pulled so you can judge freshness yourself.
Why only 8 platforms?
Quality over quantity. We index the platforms that represent the meaningful choices in the market. Adding dozens of near-identical clones would dilute the comparison without helping anyone make a better decision. New platforms are added when they offer something genuinely distinct.
Can I see the raw data?
The formula is open source. The data sources are public pricing pages, linked from each platform's ranking entry. You can verify every number yourself.
